By Elizabeth Brake
This selection of essays by way of liberal and feminist philosophers addresses the query of no matter if marriage reform should cease with same-sex marriage. a few philosophers have lately argued that marriage is intolerant and will be abolished or extensively reformed to incorporate teams and non-romantic friendships. In reaction, Simon could argues that marriage legislations may be justified with out an intolerant entice a fantastic courting variety, and Ralph Wedgwood argues that the liberal values which justify same-sex marriage don't justify extra extension. different authors argue for brand spanking new criminal kinds for intimate relationships. Marriage abolitionist Clare Chambers argues that piecemeal directives instead of dating contracts may still change marriage, and Samantha Brennan and invoice Cameron argue for setting apart marriage and parenting, with parenting instead of marriage changing into, legally and socially, the basis of the relations. Elizabeth Brake argues for a non-hierarchical friendship version for marriage. Peter de Marneffe argues that polygamy may be decriminalized, yet that the liberal nation needn't realize it, whereas Laurie Shrage argues that polygamy might be legally based to guard privateness and equality. Dan Nolan argues for transitority marriage as a criminal choice, whereas Anca Gheaus argues that marital commitments are difficult tools for securing the great of romantic and sexual love. Taken jointly, those essays problem modern understandings of marriage and the state's position in it.
Read Online or Download After Marriage: Rethinking Marital Relationships PDF
Similar gay & lesbian books
Earlier than the eighteenth-century upward thrust of the ideology of intimacy, sexuality was once outlined now not by means of social affiliations yet by means of our bodies. In prior to Intimacy , Daniel Juan Gil examines sixteenth-century English literary thoughts of sexuality that body erotic ties as neither sure by way of social customs nor transgressive of them, yet fairly as вЂњloopholesвЂќ in peopleвЂ™s reviews and institutions.
Homosexual Christian writer and activist Chris Glaser proposes that coming out--as homosexual, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered--has biblical priority and sacramental dimensions.
- Movement, Knowledge, Emotion: Gay Activism and HIV/AIDS in Australia
- Foucault Against Himself
- Lesbian and Gay Studies: An Introductory, Interdisciplinary Approach
- Feminism and Emotion: Readings in Moral and Political Philosophy
Extra info for After Marriage: Rethinking Marital Relationships
Similarly, a culture of fashionable celebrity weddings and gaudy reality shows could conceivably degrade the solemnity of the practice to the point that it became an irredeemably kitsch diversion devoid of all norms of love, sincerity, and responsibility. Nevertheless, it is plausible that presumptive permanence is a very robust sociological feature of marriage. C. Alternatives to Marriage Marriage is not the only type of presumptively permanent caring relationship. Consider the example of co-parenting.
Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003). A recent important conception of the principle is advanced in Alan Patten, “Liberal Neutrality: A Reinterpretation and Defense,” Journal of Political Philosophy 20:3 (2012): 249–272. Although the meaning of the principle is contested, the prohibition of state endorsement of a controversial philosophical conception of the good life is its core element. I set aside whether the best understanding of the principle imposes any further restrictions on the liberal state.
Even if Agnes and Bernard’s wedding is conducted by a magistrate rather than a religious cleric, they still flout a social norm by intending to divorce after a few years. It would be disingenuous for Agnes and Bernard to suggest that since their marriage is only civil, and not also sanctified in a religious ritual, it does not really matter how long they plan to remain together. As a matter of contingent sociological fact, civil marriage is not typically regarded as a purely bureaucratic matter of no normative significance.